The one-page letter laid out how their relationship would work. In exchange for the mistress’s services and becoming his “sexual property,” he would, in turn, compensate her with “tasteful accommodations to her liking” and also foot the bill for their outings. On top of that, the woman wrote she would perform “all sexual acts as requested, with suspension of historical, emotional, psychological disclaimers.” I know what you are thinking — this is basically a contract for prostitution. But I beg to differ. Why isn’t it good, practical business sense? These kinds of unspoken deals happen all the time in relationships. You get serious with a guy and you expect him to buy you things, take care of you. Certainly many mistresses do too. So if you are going to debase yourself and be with a married man, why not have a little insurance? I’m not saying this is right morally. Obviously cheating on your wife or having sex with a man you know is married rarely has a happy ending for anyone involved. But somehow the presence of this contract has helped give their arrangement longevity. Perhaps it was having such a clear set of rules and expectations set in place that kept them so willing to be together. She is now 88 and he is 93 and they are still in contact over 30 years after their affair began. It’s crazy to think that most marriages don’t even make it to year 5 and here they are still going strong. Bet Christian and Ana can’t top that! What do you think of the mistress contract?
title: " The Mistress Contract Could Be The Next 50 Shades Of Grey But Wives Won T Be Happy" ShowToc: true date: “2024-09-02” author: “Thomas Stewart”
The one-page letter laid out how their relationship would work. In exchange for the mistress’s services and becoming his “sexual property,” he would, in turn, compensate her with “tasteful accommodations to her liking” and also foot the bill for their outings. On top of that, the woman wrote she would perform “all sexual acts as requested, with suspension of historical, emotional, psychological disclaimers.” I know what you are thinking — this is basically a contract for prostitution. But I beg to differ. Why isn’t it good, practical business sense? These kinds of unspoken deals happen all the time in relationships. You get serious with a guy and you expect him to buy you things, take care of you. Certainly many mistresses do too. So if you are going to debase yourself and be with a married man, why not have a little insurance? I’m not saying this is right morally. Obviously cheating on your wife or having sex with a man you know is married rarely has a happy ending for anyone involved. But somehow the presence of this contract has helped give their arrangement longevity. Perhaps it was having such a clear set of rules and expectations set in place that kept them so willing to be together. She is now 88 and he is 93 and they are still in contact over 30 years after their affair began. It’s crazy to think that most marriages don’t even make it to year 5 and here they are still going strong. Bet Christian and Ana can’t top that! What do you think of the mistress contract?
title: " The Mistress Contract Could Be The Next 50 Shades Of Grey But Wives Won T Be Happy" ShowToc: true date: “2024-09-04” author: “Lillian Nichols”
The one-page letter laid out how their relationship would work. In exchange for the mistress’s services and becoming his “sexual property,” he would, in turn, compensate her with “tasteful accommodations to her liking” and also foot the bill for their outings. On top of that, the woman wrote she would perform “all sexual acts as requested, with suspension of historical, emotional, psychological disclaimers.” I know what you are thinking — this is basically a contract for prostitution. But I beg to differ. Why isn’t it good, practical business sense? These kinds of unspoken deals happen all the time in relationships. You get serious with a guy and you expect him to buy you things, take care of you. Certainly many mistresses do too. So if you are going to debase yourself and be with a married man, why not have a little insurance? I’m not saying this is right morally. Obviously cheating on your wife or having sex with a man you know is married rarely has a happy ending for anyone involved. But somehow the presence of this contract has helped give their arrangement longevity. Perhaps it was having such a clear set of rules and expectations set in place that kept them so willing to be together. She is now 88 and he is 93 and they are still in contact over 30 years after their affair began. It’s crazy to think that most marriages don’t even make it to year 5 and here they are still going strong. Bet Christian and Ana can’t top that! What do you think of the mistress contract?
title: " The Mistress Contract Could Be The Next 50 Shades Of Grey But Wives Won T Be Happy" ShowToc: true date: “2024-09-03” author: “Michael Varos”
The one-page letter laid out how their relationship would work. In exchange for the mistress’s services and becoming his “sexual property,” he would, in turn, compensate her with “tasteful accommodations to her liking” and also foot the bill for their outings. On top of that, the woman wrote she would perform “all sexual acts as requested, with suspension of historical, emotional, psychological disclaimers.” I know what you are thinking — this is basically a contract for prostitution. But I beg to differ. Why isn’t it good, practical business sense? These kinds of unspoken deals happen all the time in relationships. You get serious with a guy and you expect him to buy you things, take care of you. Certainly many mistresses do too. So if you are going to debase yourself and be with a married man, why not have a little insurance? I’m not saying this is right morally. Obviously cheating on your wife or having sex with a man you know is married rarely has a happy ending for anyone involved. But somehow the presence of this contract has helped give their arrangement longevity. Perhaps it was having such a clear set of rules and expectations set in place that kept them so willing to be together. She is now 88 and he is 93 and they are still in contact over 30 years after their affair began. It’s crazy to think that most marriages don’t even make it to year 5 and here they are still going strong. Bet Christian and Ana can’t top that! What do you think of the mistress contract?
title: " The Mistress Contract Could Be The Next 50 Shades Of Grey But Wives Won T Be Happy" ShowToc: true date: “2024-08-26” author: “Thelma Malamud”
The one-page letter laid out how their relationship would work. In exchange for the mistress’s services and becoming his “sexual property,” he would, in turn, compensate her with “tasteful accommodations to her liking” and also foot the bill for their outings. On top of that, the woman wrote she would perform “all sexual acts as requested, with suspension of historical, emotional, psychological disclaimers.” I know what you are thinking — this is basically a contract for prostitution. But I beg to differ. Why isn’t it good, practical business sense? These kinds of unspoken deals happen all the time in relationships. You get serious with a guy and you expect him to buy you things, take care of you. Certainly many mistresses do too. So if you are going to debase yourself and be with a married man, why not have a little insurance? I’m not saying this is right morally. Obviously cheating on your wife or having sex with a man you know is married rarely has a happy ending for anyone involved. But somehow the presence of this contract has helped give their arrangement longevity. Perhaps it was having such a clear set of rules and expectations set in place that kept them so willing to be together. She is now 88 and he is 93 and they are still in contact over 30 years after their affair began. It’s crazy to think that most marriages don’t even make it to year 5 and here they are still going strong. Bet Christian and Ana can’t top that! What do you think of the mistress contract?
title: " The Mistress Contract Could Be The Next 50 Shades Of Grey But Wives Won T Be Happy" ShowToc: true date: “2024-09-14” author: “Mary Bigelow”
The one-page letter laid out how their relationship would work. In exchange for the mistress’s services and becoming his “sexual property,” he would, in turn, compensate her with “tasteful accommodations to her liking” and also foot the bill for their outings. On top of that, the woman wrote she would perform “all sexual acts as requested, with suspension of historical, emotional, psychological disclaimers.” I know what you are thinking — this is basically a contract for prostitution. But I beg to differ. Why isn’t it good, practical business sense? These kinds of unspoken deals happen all the time in relationships. You get serious with a guy and you expect him to buy you things, take care of you. Certainly many mistresses do too. So if you are going to debase yourself and be with a married man, why not have a little insurance? I’m not saying this is right morally. Obviously cheating on your wife or having sex with a man you know is married rarely has a happy ending for anyone involved. But somehow the presence of this contract has helped give their arrangement longevity. Perhaps it was having such a clear set of rules and expectations set in place that kept them so willing to be together. She is now 88 and he is 93 and they are still in contact over 30 years after their affair began. It’s crazy to think that most marriages don’t even make it to year 5 and here they are still going strong. Bet Christian and Ana can’t top that! What do you think of the mistress contract?
title: " The Mistress Contract Could Be The Next 50 Shades Of Grey But Wives Won T Be Happy" ShowToc: true date: “2024-10-19” author: “Mitchell Harrison”
The one-page letter laid out how their relationship would work. In exchange for the mistress’s services and becoming his “sexual property,” he would, in turn, compensate her with “tasteful accommodations to her liking” and also foot the bill for their outings. On top of that, the woman wrote she would perform “all sexual acts as requested, with suspension of historical, emotional, psychological disclaimers.” I know what you are thinking — this is basically a contract for prostitution. But I beg to differ. Why isn’t it good, practical business sense? These kinds of unspoken deals happen all the time in relationships. You get serious with a guy and you expect him to buy you things, take care of you. Certainly many mistresses do too. So if you are going to debase yourself and be with a married man, why not have a little insurance? I’m not saying this is right morally. Obviously cheating on your wife or having sex with a man you know is married rarely has a happy ending for anyone involved. But somehow the presence of this contract has helped give their arrangement longevity. Perhaps it was having such a clear set of rules and expectations set in place that kept them so willing to be together. She is now 88 and he is 93 and they are still in contact over 30 years after their affair began. It’s crazy to think that most marriages don’t even make it to year 5 and here they are still going strong. Bet Christian and Ana can’t top that! What do you think of the mistress contract?
