They acknowledge that naming the sex educational materials a ‘sex box’ was probably a terrible choice, but stand by their initiative. Other than the wooden penis and cloth vagina, the box includes dolls, puzzles, books, and a teacher’s manual that suggests instructors “show that contacting body parts can be pleasurable.” It also asks teachers to encourage their young students to massage one another and themselves with warm sandbags while listening to soft music. It’s supposed to help kids “develop and experience their sexuality in a pleasurable way.” While it sort of sounds like they’re being told to touch one another’s genitals with the warm bags, I don’t think that’s the case — I think it’s more back and shoulder massaging. At least I hope. Going on that assumption, let’s move forward. I find there to be nothing wrong with educating kids early on about the birds and the bees. If a wooden penis and a fabric vagina will help kids understand what their private parts are and what they’re used for, I’m all for it. It’s a touchy subject, and no one ever really knows how to handle sex-ed, but I’m impressed with Switzerland’s candid and straight-forward approach. Whether it will help the kids or not, I don’t know, but I sure hope so. The sex-ed I got in a Virginia public school was an embarrassment, if not down-right irresponsible — for years and years I was convinced I was going to get AIDS from sexual contact and die alone. I would’ve much rather had the sandbags and wooden dicks in my classroom. What do you think of the Swiss approach to sex-ed? Photo via Editor B/Flickr
title: “Switzerland Can Teach America A Lot About Sex Ed” ShowToc: true date: “2024-09-23” author: “Marjorie Rodriguez”
They acknowledge that naming the sex educational materials a ‘sex box’ was probably a terrible choice, but stand by their initiative. Other than the wooden penis and cloth vagina, the box includes dolls, puzzles, books, and a teacher’s manual that suggests instructors “show that contacting body parts can be pleasurable.” It also asks teachers to encourage their young students to massage one another and themselves with warm sandbags while listening to soft music. It’s supposed to help kids “develop and experience their sexuality in a pleasurable way.” While it sort of sounds like they’re being told to touch one another’s genitals with the warm bags, I don’t think that’s the case — I think it’s more back and shoulder massaging. At least I hope. Going on that assumption, let’s move forward. I find there to be nothing wrong with educating kids early on about the birds and the bees. If a wooden penis and a fabric vagina will help kids understand what their private parts are and what they’re used for, I’m all for it. It’s a touchy subject, and no one ever really knows how to handle sex-ed, but I’m impressed with Switzerland’s candid and straight-forward approach. Whether it will help the kids or not, I don’t know, but I sure hope so. The sex-ed I got in a Virginia public school was an embarrassment, if not down-right irresponsible — for years and years I was convinced I was going to get AIDS from sexual contact and die alone. I would’ve much rather had the sandbags and wooden dicks in my classroom. What do you think of the Swiss approach to sex-ed? Photo via Editor B/Flickr
title: “Switzerland Can Teach America A Lot About Sex Ed” ShowToc: true date: “2024-10-11” author: “Marcus Lasala”
They acknowledge that naming the sex educational materials a ‘sex box’ was probably a terrible choice, but stand by their initiative. Other than the wooden penis and cloth vagina, the box includes dolls, puzzles, books, and a teacher’s manual that suggests instructors “show that contacting body parts can be pleasurable.” It also asks teachers to encourage their young students to massage one another and themselves with warm sandbags while listening to soft music. It’s supposed to help kids “develop and experience their sexuality in a pleasurable way.” While it sort of sounds like they’re being told to touch one another’s genitals with the warm bags, I don’t think that’s the case — I think it’s more back and shoulder massaging. At least I hope. Going on that assumption, let’s move forward. I find there to be nothing wrong with educating kids early on about the birds and the bees. If a wooden penis and a fabric vagina will help kids understand what their private parts are and what they’re used for, I’m all for it. It’s a touchy subject, and no one ever really knows how to handle sex-ed, but I’m impressed with Switzerland’s candid and straight-forward approach. Whether it will help the kids or not, I don’t know, but I sure hope so. The sex-ed I got in a Virginia public school was an embarrassment, if not down-right irresponsible — for years and years I was convinced I was going to get AIDS from sexual contact and die alone. I would’ve much rather had the sandbags and wooden dicks in my classroom. What do you think of the Swiss approach to sex-ed? Photo via Editor B/Flickr
title: “Switzerland Can Teach America A Lot About Sex Ed” ShowToc: true date: “2024-09-03” author: “Jessica Sims”
They acknowledge that naming the sex educational materials a ‘sex box’ was probably a terrible choice, but stand by their initiative. Other than the wooden penis and cloth vagina, the box includes dolls, puzzles, books, and a teacher’s manual that suggests instructors “show that contacting body parts can be pleasurable.” It also asks teachers to encourage their young students to massage one another and themselves with warm sandbags while listening to soft music. It’s supposed to help kids “develop and experience their sexuality in a pleasurable way.” While it sort of sounds like they’re being told to touch one another’s genitals with the warm bags, I don’t think that’s the case — I think it’s more back and shoulder massaging. At least I hope. Going on that assumption, let’s move forward. I find there to be nothing wrong with educating kids early on about the birds and the bees. If a wooden penis and a fabric vagina will help kids understand what their private parts are and what they’re used for, I’m all for it. It’s a touchy subject, and no one ever really knows how to handle sex-ed, but I’m impressed with Switzerland’s candid and straight-forward approach. Whether it will help the kids or not, I don’t know, but I sure hope so. The sex-ed I got in a Virginia public school was an embarrassment, if not down-right irresponsible — for years and years I was convinced I was going to get AIDS from sexual contact and die alone. I would’ve much rather had the sandbags and wooden dicks in my classroom. What do you think of the Swiss approach to sex-ed? Photo via Editor B/Flickr
title: “Switzerland Can Teach America A Lot About Sex Ed” ShowToc: true date: “2024-10-23” author: “Glenn Robinson”
They acknowledge that naming the sex educational materials a ‘sex box’ was probably a terrible choice, but stand by their initiative. Other than the wooden penis and cloth vagina, the box includes dolls, puzzles, books, and a teacher’s manual that suggests instructors “show that contacting body parts can be pleasurable.” It also asks teachers to encourage their young students to massage one another and themselves with warm sandbags while listening to soft music. It’s supposed to help kids “develop and experience their sexuality in a pleasurable way.” While it sort of sounds like they’re being told to touch one another’s genitals with the warm bags, I don’t think that’s the case — I think it’s more back and shoulder massaging. At least I hope. Going on that assumption, let’s move forward. I find there to be nothing wrong with educating kids early on about the birds and the bees. If a wooden penis and a fabric vagina will help kids understand what their private parts are and what they’re used for, I’m all for it. It’s a touchy subject, and no one ever really knows how to handle sex-ed, but I’m impressed with Switzerland’s candid and straight-forward approach. Whether it will help the kids or not, I don’t know, but I sure hope so. The sex-ed I got in a Virginia public school was an embarrassment, if not down-right irresponsible — for years and years I was convinced I was going to get AIDS from sexual contact and die alone. I would’ve much rather had the sandbags and wooden dicks in my classroom. What do you think of the Swiss approach to sex-ed? Photo via Editor B/Flickr
title: “Switzerland Can Teach America A Lot About Sex Ed” ShowToc: true date: “2024-10-10” author: “Sarah Ramin”
They acknowledge that naming the sex educational materials a ‘sex box’ was probably a terrible choice, but stand by their initiative. Other than the wooden penis and cloth vagina, the box includes dolls, puzzles, books, and a teacher’s manual that suggests instructors “show that contacting body parts can be pleasurable.” It also asks teachers to encourage their young students to massage one another and themselves with warm sandbags while listening to soft music. It’s supposed to help kids “develop and experience their sexuality in a pleasurable way.” While it sort of sounds like they’re being told to touch one another’s genitals with the warm bags, I don’t think that’s the case — I think it’s more back and shoulder massaging. At least I hope. Going on that assumption, let’s move forward. I find there to be nothing wrong with educating kids early on about the birds and the bees. If a wooden penis and a fabric vagina will help kids understand what their private parts are and what they’re used for, I’m all for it. It’s a touchy subject, and no one ever really knows how to handle sex-ed, but I’m impressed with Switzerland’s candid and straight-forward approach. Whether it will help the kids or not, I don’t know, but I sure hope so. The sex-ed I got in a Virginia public school was an embarrassment, if not down-right irresponsible — for years and years I was convinced I was going to get AIDS from sexual contact and die alone. I would’ve much rather had the sandbags and wooden dicks in my classroom. What do you think of the Swiss approach to sex-ed? Photo via Editor B/Flickr
title: “Switzerland Can Teach America A Lot About Sex Ed” ShowToc: true date: “2024-08-28” author: “Maria Wilber”
They acknowledge that naming the sex educational materials a ‘sex box’ was probably a terrible choice, but stand by their initiative. Other than the wooden penis and cloth vagina, the box includes dolls, puzzles, books, and a teacher’s manual that suggests instructors “show that contacting body parts can be pleasurable.” It also asks teachers to encourage their young students to massage one another and themselves with warm sandbags while listening to soft music. It’s supposed to help kids “develop and experience their sexuality in a pleasurable way.” While it sort of sounds like they’re being told to touch one another’s genitals with the warm bags, I don’t think that’s the case — I think it’s more back and shoulder massaging. At least I hope. Going on that assumption, let’s move forward. I find there to be nothing wrong with educating kids early on about the birds and the bees. If a wooden penis and a fabric vagina will help kids understand what their private parts are and what they’re used for, I’m all for it. It’s a touchy subject, and no one ever really knows how to handle sex-ed, but I’m impressed with Switzerland’s candid and straight-forward approach. Whether it will help the kids or not, I don’t know, but I sure hope so. The sex-ed I got in a Virginia public school was an embarrassment, if not down-right irresponsible — for years and years I was convinced I was going to get AIDS from sexual contact and die alone. I would’ve much rather had the sandbags and wooden dicks in my classroom. What do you think of the Swiss approach to sex-ed? Photo via Editor B/Flickr
title: “Switzerland Can Teach America A Lot About Sex Ed” ShowToc: true date: “2024-09-05” author: “Christine Underwood”
They acknowledge that naming the sex educational materials a ‘sex box’ was probably a terrible choice, but stand by their initiative. Other than the wooden penis and cloth vagina, the box includes dolls, puzzles, books, and a teacher’s manual that suggests instructors “show that contacting body parts can be pleasurable.” It also asks teachers to encourage their young students to massage one another and themselves with warm sandbags while listening to soft music. It’s supposed to help kids “develop and experience their sexuality in a pleasurable way.” While it sort of sounds like they’re being told to touch one another’s genitals with the warm bags, I don’t think that’s the case — I think it’s more back and shoulder massaging. At least I hope. Going on that assumption, let’s move forward. I find there to be nothing wrong with educating kids early on about the birds and the bees. If a wooden penis and a fabric vagina will help kids understand what their private parts are and what they’re used for, I’m all for it. It’s a touchy subject, and no one ever really knows how to handle sex-ed, but I’m impressed with Switzerland’s candid and straight-forward approach. Whether it will help the kids or not, I don’t know, but I sure hope so. The sex-ed I got in a Virginia public school was an embarrassment, if not down-right irresponsible — for years and years I was convinced I was going to get AIDS from sexual contact and die alone. I would’ve much rather had the sandbags and wooden dicks in my classroom. What do you think of the Swiss approach to sex-ed? Photo via Editor B/Flickr
